От халепа... Ця сторінка ще не має українського перекладу, але ми вже над цим працюємо!
От халепа... Ця сторінка ще не має українського перекладу, але ми вже над цим працюємо!
Olena Slyvka
/
UI/UX Designer
9 min read
What’s your product’s strongest advantage in winning customers and capturing market share? A standout user experience, hands down. So, how do you know you’re offering one? The answer is simple: usability testing.
Skipping this key step in your software development lifecycle means missing out on the chance to boost conversions, grow user loyalty, and cut support costs. And that’s not just talk — we’ve had startup clients who’ve enjoyed these exact benefits and seen others who’ve regretted cutting the usability testing corner.
Let’s dive into the real reasons why you need usability testing and what it involves.
Article content:
Simply put, usability testing is a way to check how well your website, app, or digital product works by having real users try to complete tasks with it.
This is worth pointing out because usability testing is often confused with user testing, which is a bit different.
An essential part of the UI/UX design process, usability testing zooms in on how simple and intuitive it is for users to interact with your product. The main question it helps you answer is:
Can users complete their tasks or reach their goals with our product easily?
In contrast, user testing is a broader testing concept. User testing measures a range of feedback and performance metrics, which may or may not include ease of use. The biggest question it helps to answer is:
What do users think about using our product or service?
If you’re in a startup on a tight budget, it’s tempting to just get other team members or peers to test usability. But that means you miss out on how people will understand and use your product in the wild. A much better approach is to prepare a test design and workflow to get real users to spot issues for you, as they are less biased and more representative of your target audience.
See also: Accessibility in mobile development: Creating an app for everyone
Usability testing requires three core elements:
When you combine a skilled facilitator, realistic tasks, and the right participants, you uncover your key usability issues and get to make smarter, more user-focused design improvements.
To better focus your efforts, you can also use different types of usability testing.
There are two types of usability testing: moderated and unmoderated.
In moderated usability testing, a moderator guides participants through the process, either in person (where they can directly observe users) or remotely via video calls with screen sharing. This method is awesome for uncovering the “why” behind user behavior, giving you valuable, qualitative insights that can shape design decisions early on.
Unmoderated usability testing, on the other hand, lets participants complete tasks on their own without a moderator. It’s perfect for testing specific features and usually involves automated tools. This method shines when you need quantitative data — it’s ideal for spotting patterns and tracking how often issues or behaviors pop up.
If you don’t know which you need, think of it like this:
While not strictly a part of usability testing, a design audit can be a useful complement. Here’s how they differ and relate:
A design audit can be a useful first step as it helps catch clear design problems before you dive into testing. This ensures that when you test with real users, you’re addressing issues that might not be immediately apparent but could still impact UX.
See also: From idea to launch: The role of the discovery phase in software development projects
A common mistake is thinking usability testing should only happen near the end of development, just to catch bugs. In reality, usability testing should be an integrative part of your SDLC.
Continuous usability testing helps keep your product relevant and user-focused throughout its lifecycle. You can tailor your testing to fit any stage of development, but here’s when to make it a priority for a great final UX:
Before designing: Early research helps you build a strong, user-centered design foundation, and you don’t even need a product to do it. Consider usability testing with a competitor app: if users frequently struggle with a particular feature, you can avoid those pitfalls in your own design.
With wireframes or prototypes: Test your design at each stage as you move from wireframes to prototypes. This iterative testing helps you tweak and improve based on real user feedback. Imagine you’re testing a prototype for an e-commerce site, and users find the checkout process confusing. Adjustments made here can lead to a smoother experience in the final product, and they’re much cheaper to fix at this stage.
Before launch: Conduct a final round of testing to check that your product is ready for the market. Summative testing helps determine if your product is up to par or if more tweaks are needed. For instance, if users struggle with the final version of a mobile app’s navigation, you’ll want to address these issues before the official launch.
After launch: Don’t stop testing once your product is live. Ongoing usability testing ensures your product remains user-friendly and up-to-date. For example, if user feedback shows new features aren’t as intuitive as expected, you can plan updates and improvements. This cycle of testing, updating, and re-testing helps keep your product fresh and relevant.
The benefits of usability testing combine the advantages of good UX with the business benefits of more efficient development, resulting in:
For more insights on how our usability testing services and proven testing approaches can enhance your product and streamline development, explore A story of software testing services at NERDZ LAB.
The right tool stack for usability testing depends on the type of testing you’re doing. Here are the most common tools to get you started.
Tools for unmoderated usability testing | Tools for moderated usability testing |
Maze – Offers heatmaps, click tracking, and quantitative task data. | Zoom – Allows video conferencing with screen sharing, perfect for live moderated tests. |
Hotjar – Includes heatmaps and session recordings to track user behavior. | Google Meet – An alternative to Zoom that integrates seamlessly with other Google tools. |
UserTesting – Provides user video feedback with task completion tracking, allowing you to observe how users interact with your product. They also offer access to their own panel of testers and provide test templates to streamline the testing process. | UserTesting – Supports live moderated sessions and gives real-time feedback through videos and screen sharing. |
Optimal Workshop – Focuses on tree testing and first-click testing for navigation insights. | WebEx – Provides video conferencing with screen sharing, perfect for live, remote moderated tests. |
Lookback – Allows users to perform tasks independently while being recorded for later review. | Lookback – Enables live remote interviews with screen sharing and recording. |
TryMyUI – Records participant experiences and screen interactions: a good choice for user interface design testing. | UserZoom – Supports real-time participant management and insights. |
Loop11 – Helps gather quantitative data such as task success rates and times. | GoToMeeting – Offers screen sharing and recording features for live usability tests. |
UsabilityHub – Conducts preference tests, navigation assessments, and design surveys. | Microsoft Teams – Ideal for moderated testing with built-in screen sharing. |
Usability testing, along with user experience testing and design testing, is a core part of our user-centric product design approach at NERDZ LAB. We use different tools to ensure our products meet user needs and expectations.
One of our top choices is Maze. It allows us to test with the right audience by selecting respondents based on specific demographic criteria. Maze provides both quantitative and qualitative insights, giving us a full picture of the user experience. It’s also cost-effective and integrates smoothly with Figma, so we can gather feedback directly from the design platform.
We’ve relied on Maze in multiple projects, such as in design testing for Rosecut, where it provided crucial user feedback. In other projects, like the all-in-one personal manager app, we carried out detailed UX design audits that helped us spot potential issues early, setting the stage for more effective user testing later on.
We also developed Userfeel — a usability testing tool that records videos of real users speaking their thoughts as they use a website or app. Userfeel works on both iOS and Android and records and uploads testing videos in the background, with features like file compression and automatic recovery for interrupted uploads. We use it for unmoderated usability testing, providing real-time feedback from actual users, which helps us refine designs to meet user needs more effectively.
Whether we’re testing with Maze, auditing UX designs, or leveraging tools like Userfeel, the focus of our usability testing services remains the same: delivering intuitive, effective designs that are tailored to your target users.
The results of usability testing give you a clear snapshot of how real users interact with your product. In practice, that means you get data, which can be either qualitative or quantitative.
Qualitative usability testing is all about the details — how users interact with your design and where they hit snags. It’s a more hands-on approach that helps you spot and understand specific usability issues.
Examples of qualitative testing results:
You can gather qualitative data by watching users interact with your product and asking them follow-up questions. This type of testing is invaluable during the design phase to make sure the final product is intuitive and user-friendly.
Quantitative usability testing gives you hard numbers on how well users are able to complete tasks. This approach is about gathering data on performance metrics to evaluate usability objectively.
Examples of quantitative testing results:
Quantitative data is useful structured feedback that helps you track improvements. However, it doesn’t explain why users encounter issues, which is why you need both qualitative and quantitative feedback to improve your product.
“Shift left” is becoming a standard requirement for secure systems design. In short, it means addressing security concerns as early as possible in the development.
By focusing on real user interactions, usability testing helps you boost conversions, enhance customer loyalty, and reduce support costs. The goal is always a smoother, more intuitive, and effective product that engages and helps your users.
In the end, it’s about us working together: you bring the idea or need for a standout new product, and we help you develop it so it performs at its best and contributes to long-term business success. If you’re looking for a development partner who’s been in your shoes but is further down the road, get in touch. We’d love to be part of your story.